To request an interview with a DCEG investigator, contact the NCI Office of Media Relations:
Watch Dr. Friesen discuss her research at the 2010 Environmental Exposures and Women's Health seminar.
Melissa Friesen, Ph.D.
|Organization:||National Cancer InstituteDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology|
|Address:||9609 Medical Center DriveRoom 6E602|
Dr. Friesen received a Ph.D. (2006) and M.Sc. (2001) in occupational hygiene from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada. She completed postdoctoral studies at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and at the University of California at Berkeley. She joined the NCI as a tenure-track investigator in the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch in June 2009.
Dr. Friesen's research has focused on quantitative assessment strategies to minimize exposure misclassification in occupational epidemiologic studies. She has focused on improving exposure estimates, evaluating the robustness of exposure-response relationships to exposure assessment strategies, and using statistical models for both developing exposure metrics and evaluating their exposure-response relationships. By using more refined and more proximal exposure measures, her research has resulted in quantitative exposure-response relationships for several exposure-disease associations that have not previously been published.
In OEEB, Dr. Friesen extends her research from industry-based studies to develop transparent measurement- and decision rule-based methods to assess occupational exposure in case-control studies and population-based cohorts. Exposure assessment in these studies relies heavily on subject-reported information and the professional judgment of exposure assessors. She has demonstrated that decision-rule based approaches are comparable to the estimates from a traditional job-by-job expert review and can replicate the average rating from a team of experts. She has also developed a method to use data mining methods (e.g. classification trees, CT) to extract underlying (but not explicitly stated) decision rules from the relationship between exposure estimates derived from professional judgment and questionnaire responses. The resulting CT decision trees extract the valuable information from previous assessments and thus allow the decision rules to be used to estimate exposure in other studies with similar exposure information. As a result, exposure assessors can focus their attention on the exposure scenarios identified by the CT model as being difficult to assess and on scenarios that were not covered by the decision rules. Most importantly, identifying the decision rules removes the assessment from its much criticized ‘black box’.
To anchor the intensity estimate in the decision rules to a concentration scale, Dr. Friesen has extended the use of statistical models that are commonly used in industry-based studies to predict historical exposure to population-based studies. For example, she has developed a framework to combine subjective ratings of exposure from job exposure matrices (JEMs) and exposure measurements to better discriminate between time and job differences in exposure levels in population-based studies. She has also demonstrated the utility of meta-regression models to identify temporal trends and occupation- and industry-specific differences in occupational lead exposure using summary statistics extracted from the published literature.
Dr. Friesen also develops exposure assessment tools to facilitate the use of occupational risk factor data in epidemiologic studies by efficiently transforming the verbatim participants’ responses from occupational questionnaires into usable data. She led the development of an algorithm, SOCcer (Standardized Occupation Coding for Computer-assisted Epidemiological Research), to automatically code job descriptions into standardized occupation classification (SOC) codes. She also developed a keyword-based approach to use the verbatim responses to systematically extract variables representing exposure scenarios that can be used in decision rules.
During the Environmental Exposures and Women's Health seminar series held on October 5, 2010, Dr. Friesen discussed the importance of examining cancer risk separately in men and women. Specifically, she focused on sex differences in the accuracy of exposure assessment tools for epidemiologic studies. View Dr. Friesen's presentation, “Women are not just small men”. In analyses pooling occupational responses from three OEEB studies, she found gender differences in the prevalence and frequency of work tasks. These differences would result in exposure misclassification if these work task differences are not considered and demonstrate the need for incorporating job modules to capture individual-level occupational information.